Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Garland Remington III's avatar

What president Trump has done is like he said in his speech from the Rose garden yesterday.

“Going back five presidents, we have lost 6 1/2 million manufacturing jobs. Republican president and democrat presidents did nothing to stop it. In fact, they cheered on globalization. What we are doing is to help Main Street not Wall Street.”

To put this in perspective, that’s the population of North Dakota / South Dakota / Wyoming

Alaska / Vermont / Delaware.

Expand full comment
Doug's avatar

Martin Armstrong straightens me out regarding Smoot Hawley tariffs on agriculture products and that they were not likely to be the largest, singular cause of the Great Depression, when he says:

"While all we hear is how the Smoot-Hawley Tariff caused the Great Depression, that was total fiction. Here is a chart of US tariffs since 1784. The Smoot-Hawley tariff was on Agriculture in 1930. The Socialist economist omitted the sovereign defaults of 1931, which included Canada, Europe, South America, and much of Asia.

The causes of the Great Depression have been debated for decades. The problem with all of the analysis is this same attempt to reduce the cause to a single event. In school, we read The Great Crash by Galbraith. He was a socialist, so he blamed the corporations and never bothered to mention the Sovereign Defaults of 1931, for that would have accused the government instead of the private sector. Then there is the argument that the tariffs at least “contributed” to the Great Depression, if they were the leading factor, again disregarding the Sovereign Debt defaults.

Smoot-Hawley wasn’t signed into law until June 17th, 1930, when stocks had already taken a nosedive from the September 1929 high. Cato Institute’s Alan Reynolds argued that Smoot-Hawley was an ongoing drag on the economy and that it was, in fact, a substantial contribution to the stock market, arguing that traders saw it coming and acted in anticipation. The argument on the one hand correctly states that traders acted in anticipation. Still, it incorrectly adopts the position that BUT FOR the tariff issue, the stock market would have continued higher anyway?

Moreover, the pretense that somehow the Smoot-Hawley Tariff created or contributed to the Great Depression, ignoring the European Sovereign Debt Crisis, is really a specious argument."

Expand full comment
1 more comment...

No posts