Trump Witch Hunt #53: All Have Failed, Illegality Never Found
Hysterical Democrats Are Serial Lawbreakers, Serial Accusers and Serial Liars. It's All Political "Tar and Feathering" Slander and Libel.
From Politico: Donald Trump fumed last week that the judge "(Merchan) conducting his arraignment Tuesday — and likely overseeing his criminal trial — “HATES ME.”
The basis for Trump’s assessment, made on Truth Social Friday, is that the judge, Juan Merchan, presided over two unrelated criminal tax fraud cases involving Trump’s real estate firm and his former CFO, both of which resulted in outcomes unfavorable to the defense. In the case of former CFO Allen Weisselberg, Merchan, citing corporate greed, said he would have imposed a “stiffer sentence” than the five months jail time the ex-executive got from a plea deal.
In most professional situations, a judge like that would recuse himself. But there’s nothing professional about this situation — it’s strictly political.
Then, there’s this:
And Paul’s right on the money. Daily Mail also did a piece on the judges daughter. Her name is Lauren and she’s got quite a progressive resume under her belt.
Speculation of political bias is heightening surrounding Donald Trump’s indictment after it was revealed the daughter of the judge presiding over the case worked for Vice President Kamala Harris’ 2020 presidential run and a slew of other progressive campaigns.
Trump railed against Judge Juan Manuel Merchan in a social media rant ahead of his arraignment on Tuesday afternoon with a post claiming the judge is from a ‘family of well known Trump haters.’
Loren Merchan, the 34-year-old daughter of the Manhattan judge, is partner and president of Authentic Campaigns, a progressive digital firm, and worked on several high-profile Democratic campaigns – including for President Joe Biden.
Of course, after hearing this, President Trump’s legal team called foul and once again asked for the Judge to be removed form the case and requested the trail be moved from Manhattan to the more politically neutral Staten Island.
It’s doubtful either of those requests will be approved. After all, the judge, venue, and jury have likely been hand-picked by the regime, and there’s no backing out now.
This is the most blatant, shameless, and dangerous political stunt the left has pulled yet, and that’s saying a lot, because they’ve unleashed some doozies.
Here is the words that I posted on another website that I also follow, that is owned by Paul Joseph Watson’s company. The name of the website is called, “BARE NAKED ISLAM.” you will not find one article on any place of the website.
That is wrong. Let me drive that point home. You will not find one article on his website. That is wrong. You know moving forward the words I posted on an article that he ran pertaining to this absolutely disgusting and atrocious indictment.
If you don’t think that this judge will not find President Trump guilty? Then you have another thing coming my friend. This judge could be presented with the open and shut, completely slam dunk, win of a NOT-GUILTY OF A CASE, / NOT GUILTY WIN And this judge will still find him guilty.
How can this happen you may ask? because it’s like an interview between Nigel Farage when he interviewed Rudy Giuliani just day before yesterday on his YouTube channel. In among one of several questions, he asked Rudy was what was his personal opinion concerning the law around the case.
Keep in mind that Rudy Giuliani is born and raised in the state of New York, and has practice law in New York during his entire legal career. Here is the words he said, among many, and I quote verbatim. “ this case is not about the law.
Two other federal prosecutors that I know on a personal basis look at this case, and dismissed it themselves is having no merit. This is all about politics. This is all about feeding the far left real, they are they are real Fascist. It’s about politics, and nothing else.”
In another video I watched Alan Dershowitz get interviewed by someone on some news channel that I’ve never even heard of, but I’m so glad it was in my news feed on YouTube. The name of the video is titled,
“ HE'S NOT TELLING THE TRUTH': Alan Dershowitz challenges Manhattan DA Bragg on Trump indictment.” https://youtu.be/K5Stu8QoKnI In this video, he flat out challenges this piece of shit district attorney, that flat out, ran his campaign, publicly, by publicly stating this.
“ If you elect me, I promise you I will do what no other prosecutor has done so far. I will do what they were too scared to do and that is I will indict President Trump if you will elect me.”
In the video that everybody should watch, you will hear Alan Dershowitz challenge district attorney brag to quote him even one case in the history of America, To quote him one case in the state of New York like you said what he’s doing has been done before in New York.
And, in New York City. I challenge you. Please, Please, DA Bragg take up my challenge. Please take it up! “Me just one case in the state of New York, and in the city of New York, where every rule of law that you are trying to use has been used before.”
“And, what happens if he doesn’t take up your challenge, Mr. Dershowitz? well, he’s not going to because he can’t. And that’s because he’s lying. He’s flat out lying to the American people and he’s lying to the citizens of New York and especially the citizens of New York City. He has given them the best red meat they could ever want, I’ve lost friends, yes that.
That that is exactly right. I’ve lost friends over my latest book that came out last month and I’ve got it right here and it’s called., (he holds up the book and you can see the cover of it. It’s titled, “GET TRUMP!” I have lost nearly every friend that I’ve had nearly my entire life. Over my defense of President Trump‘s personal civil liberties.
Even though I didn’t vote for him, and even though I do agree with him on certain things, and I don’t agree with him on certain things, the man is still entitled to his own personal civil liberties in the Democrat party has violated them from the time that he announced that he would run for office.
The man has been investigated up one side and down the other. Just by the Robert Mueller investigation and you know you know they turned his life inside out looking for anything. Absolutely anything they could hang him on.
And there’s nothing they could find! and if there’s anything that could’ve been found and brought to light, don’t you think they would have done it?? they have been, they, who, who do I mean they are? The Democrat party is who I mean! when I say they. Come on, come on. I think you know that, what I mean and who I mean!
But they have been trying to shut him up all these years and they haven’t been able to do it. What’s up next, assassination?? don’t put anything aside when it comes to this deep state! I have personally had a chance to come to know him on a very personal basis over the last few years.
And this is a good man and he has a very very good family and they are so very tight. All of them back him up and he’s not about to quit. And every time he gets attacked and it hasn’t dawned on them on yet. Dawned on them yet but every time they attack him it just fuels his fires to, To to strike back.” Alan Dershowitz.
Concerning his book that I have ordered on Amazon, Here is what you will read, On [ll the website.
“ In Get Trump: The Threat to Civil Liberties, Due Process, and Our Constitutional Rule of Law, Alan Dershowitz—#1 New York Times bestselling author and one of America’s most respected legal scholars—analyses the unremitting efforts by political opponents of Donald Trump to “get” him—to stop him from running in 2024—at any cost.
Alan Dershowitz has been called “one of the most prominent and consistent defenders of civil liberties in America” by Politico and “the nation’s most peripatetic civil liberties lawyer and one of its most distinguished defenders of individual rights” by Newsweek.
Get Trump makes clear that unconstitutional efforts to stop Trump from retaking the presidency challenge the very foundations of our liberty: due process, right to counsel, and free speech.
Those who justify these dangerous departures from the rule of law argue that the threat posed by a second Trump presidency is “different” and “immediate,” while the departures from constitutional norms are longer term and more abstract.
Dershowitz explains that defenders of Trump’s constitutional rights—even those like him who oppose Trump politically—are sought to be silenced; their free speech rights attacked, their integrity questioned, and their careers threatened.
Much of the media substitutes advocacy against Trump for objective reporting, while many in academia petition and propagandize against rights they previously valued—all in the interest of getting Trump.
The essence of justice is that it must be equally applicable to all, Dershowitz notes. No one is above the law but digging to find crimes in order to influence an election does not constitute the equal application of the law.
In order to assure equal application in comparable situations, he proposes two criteria for indicting a likely candidate of the opposing party: the Richard Nixon standard and the Hillary Clinton standard—and most recently, the Joe Biden standard.
Get Trump warns that regardless of whether this anti-democratic effort to stop Trump from running succeeds or fails, it is likely to create dangerous precedents that will lie around like loaded weapons ready to be deployed against other controversial candidates, officials, or citizens about whom it can be argued that the danger they pose “is different.”
https://www.amazon.com/Get-Trump-Liberties-Process-Constitutional/dp/1510777814